Initial reflections on Up the Anti
Simon Hardy offers his thoughts on last Saturday’s Up the Anti event
Up the Anti had something of an experiment-like character. We wanted to build a broad, left wing conference, that appraised the big questions facing radical politics in a fraternal atmosphere of critical debate, where people from different political traditions (and none) could discuss the future of the movement and progressive politics more generally. By those criteria the event was a success. Given that it was co-sponsored by a collection of left wing websites, networks and magazines with a small number of activists amongst them, the event still attracted about 300 people (we had 322 registrations in total but not all advance ticket holders turned up so attendance was below that).
Sessions on debt strikes, trade unions and Greece attracted good numbers of people with lively discussions. The journalism session was informative and good spirited. Radical interpretations of the crisis had mixed, indeed many negative, reviews that were summed it up by one person as “four middle aged white men arguing with each other”. The session on the extradition of Talha Ahsan and Islamophobia saw moving, powerful talks from Victoria Brittain and Talha’s brother Hamja Ahsan that were incredibly composed and balanced given the scale of the injustice discussed. Our session, where we launched Beyond Capitalism? The Future of Radical Politics, saw a lively interchange with Aaron Peters, followed by lots of hands going up in the audience and a hard hitting but largely fraternal debate with plenty of good humour. In the housing session there was also a debate between squatters’ rights activists and those who wanted to focus on defending and extending council housing. That session should probably have been extended and turned into a potential space to launch a campaign around housing issues, as rent prices go through the roof in cities like London.
We wanted to try to create a space for radical and critical thinking about left wing politics that wasn’t the preserve of one group or party, but encouraged a plurality of voices. Trying to build and develop a movement, always involves a learning curve and the event was far from perfect. Most importantly, however, it was hopefully the beginning of a process of coming together of different elements on the anticapitalist left. Those who want to build a stronger radical movement, who are prepared to rethink how we should organise to make our politics more effective, and develop a more organic link between theory and practice. With such big and ambitious aims, putting it into practice would always be an uncertain experiment.
Firstly, there was a lack of female speakers on the platforms. More women speakers were invited and even confirmed, but sadly we suffered from a series of late cancellations. Last minute replacements were found who mostly turned out to be men that upset the gender composition of the panels. Certainly, in the planning stages we endeavoured to have at least one female speaker on each platform – but on the day we just didn’t manage it. We had in the early stages planned on having a session on feminism specifically, but abandoned that in favour of just having more women speakers on the platforms, aiming to escape from the usual logic that “women only talk about women’s issues”. But as was pointed out on the day we didn’t have anything on feminism and there were not many women speakers anyway, so the conference fell between two stalls. This was certainly a big problem.
Secondly, we had wanted to organise some of the sessions in a more “un-conference-like” way, including the trade union session and the direct action session, but on the day they ended up just being panel discussions organised along the same lines as other sessions. The only one that managed to break out of that rut was the debt strikes meeting which activists from Occupy helped to break down into workgroups. This was also another lesson for the future.
There were also some sessions which just needed more thought. Some of the speakers ended up as quite an eclectic mix, not really engaging with each other and just presenting their own arguments – a couple of which came across as very academic. This excluded some people as left wing intellectuals enjoyed the more “abstract” discussions but many others were just left feeling bewildered by talk of “prefigurative transformations”. Lesson learned – we need a clearer demarcation of speakers and topics that appeal to people in more attractive, familiar and everyday language.
Finally, there was nothing on the environment. As the planet hurtles towards an uncertain environmental future, we should be learning from the diverse ecological struggles across the globe. Of course, we did have to make decisions over what to leave out due to space and cost. The list of topics where we thought we “have to have this” was very long, cutting it down was a process of elimination, partly based on what speakers we could get at the time. But still, to discuss an alternative future without talking about the ecological abyss capitalism is moving towards is an unforgivable lacuna for a radical conference of the left in the 21st century.
Despite these criticisms the great majority of people at the conference seemed positive about what we were trying to do.
A quite eclectic mix of groups and publications across the left succeeded in organising and building a relatively successful conference, one that did succeed in some of its aims. It was very far from being the homogenous top down event organised by one sect or other we are all accustomed to.
If you want that you can go to all kinds of other meetings and conferences. Up the Anti had the flavour of the anticapitalist movement in all its rich debates and differences. Whilst this report is only the product of my own personal views, as an organising collective I think we can speak with one voice when we thank the speakers and chairs for their work and also the people who came to Up the Anti. Most of you probably weren’t sure what to expect, but I hope that by the end of the day you took something positive away with you.