<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AntiCapitalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anticapitalists.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anticapitalists.org</link>
	<description>For unity, debate and action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:32:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Towards Revolutionary Unity by R Wood</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/05/14/towards-revolutionary-unity/#comment-6522</link>
		<dc:creator>R Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4373#comment-6522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many words? Whether that was the thought of a &#039;troll&#039; I don&#039;t know but in the short to medium-term I think space will need to be made for many more words. What I found particularly interesting in Cader&#039;s post is the view that the &quot;spirit of &#039;45&quot; can limit horizons. I would agree — because I&#039;ve said much the same thing. Today anti-capitalist alternatives cannot be limited in some &#039;nostalgia&#039; for social democratic/Keynesian compromise. In a similar vein I have argued that democratic functioning (within the left for a start) should illustrate in practice what it is we are struggling to achieve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many words? Whether that was the thought of a &#8216;troll&#8217; I don&#8217;t know but in the short to medium-term I think space will need to be made for many more words. What I found particularly interesting in Cader&#8217;s post is the view that the &#8220;spirit of &#8217;45&#8243; can limit horizons. I would agree — because I&#8217;ve said much the same thing. Today anti-capitalist alternatives cannot be limited in some &#8216;nostalgia&#8217; for social democratic/Keynesian compromise. In a similar vein I have argued that democratic functioning (within the left for a start) should illustrate in practice what it is we are struggling to achieve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Towards Revolutionary Unity by Honos</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/05/14/towards-revolutionary-unity/#comment-6515</link>
		<dc:creator>Honos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4373#comment-6515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very few words. What are you actually for beyond trolling?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very few words. What are you actually for beyond trolling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Towards Revolutionary Unity by Maïa Pal</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/05/14/towards-revolutionary-unity/#comment-6503</link>
		<dc:creator>Maïa Pal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4373#comment-6503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second part with practical proposals will be published next week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second part with practical proposals will be published next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Towards Revolutionary Unity by Pham Binh</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/05/14/towards-revolutionary-unity/#comment-6488</link>
		<dc:creator>Pham Binh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4373#comment-6488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This piece argues that whilst we should be supportive of broad Left Unity calls in the domain of electoral politics, it is of immediate urgency that the radical left take their place in this movement and fight for revolutionary transformation.&quot;

This begs the question of what it means to &quot;fight for revolutionary transformation&quot; in a context where defensive struggles over reforms (NHS, opposing the bedroom tax&quot;)? Meaning, how can there be talk of revolutionary transformation when we are losing reform fights?

Comrades may be interested in my critique of the capitalist realist argument as well: http://www.thenorthstar.info/?p=8095]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This piece argues that whilst we should be supportive of broad Left Unity calls in the domain of electoral politics, it is of immediate urgency that the radical left take their place in this movement and fight for revolutionary transformation.&#8221;</p>
<p>This begs the question of what it means to &#8220;fight for revolutionary transformation&#8221; in a context where defensive struggles over reforms (NHS, opposing the bedroom tax&#8221;)? Meaning, how can there be talk of revolutionary transformation when we are losing reform fights?</p>
<p>Comrades may be interested in my critique of the capitalist realist argument as well: <a href="http://www.thenorthstar.info/?p=8095" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenorthstar.info/?p=8095</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Towards Revolutionary Unity by billj</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/05/14/towards-revolutionary-unity/#comment-6487</link>
		<dc:creator>billj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4373#comment-6487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many words, but what are you actually for?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many words, but what are you actually for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Us by Towards Revolutionary Unity - AntiCapitalists</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/about-us/#comment-6475</link>
		<dc:creator>Towards Revolutionary Unity - AntiCapitalists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?page_id=61#comment-6475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] About [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ‘Idealists with no military training’: remembering the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising by Pham Binh</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/04/20/idealists-with-no-military-training-remembering-the-warsaw-ghetto-uprising-2/#comment-6429</link>
		<dc:creator>Pham Binh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 18:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4280#comment-6429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never dance around issues. Ever. I unequivocally support the Syrian revolution. I do not attach strings to my support. Who they ask for arms and what deals they cut with which Great Satan is their prerogative, not mine, because I support oppressed people&#039;s right to self-determination. Evidently you do not.

The Christian community is not 100% behind the regime. If they were, they wouldn&#039;t be in the FSA: www.thenorthstar.info/?p=2528
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DkzmKOBNcA

Furthermore, the Sunnis who were ethnically cleansed from Banias just recently found shelter in three nearby Christian villages.

Please, educate yourself about what is actually going on before accusing me of working for the CIA. You&#039;re only embarrassing yourself in this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never dance around issues. Ever. I unequivocally support the Syrian revolution. I do not attach strings to my support. Who they ask for arms and what deals they cut with which Great Satan is their prerogative, not mine, because I support oppressed people&#8217;s right to self-determination. Evidently you do not.</p>
<p>The Christian community is not 100% behind the regime. If they were, they wouldn&#8217;t be in the FSA: <a href="http://www.thenorthstar.info/?p=2528" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenorthstar.info/?p=2528</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DkzmKOBNcA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DkzmKOBNcA</a></p>
<p>Furthermore, the Sunnis who were ethnically cleansed from Banias just recently found shelter in three nearby Christian villages.</p>
<p>Please, educate yourself about what is actually going on before accusing me of working for the CIA. You&#8217;re only embarrassing yourself in this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ‘Idealists with no military training’: remembering the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising by John Grimshaw</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/04/20/idealists-with-no-military-training-remembering-the-warsaw-ghetto-uprising-2/#comment-6363</link>
		<dc:creator>John Grimshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 09:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4280#comment-6363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So even though you dance round the issue, your solution to the &quot;Syrian impasse&quot; ultimately is for the Imperialists to arm the &quot;popular uprising&quot; irrespective of what that means? You should apply for a job at Langley maybe? Or Mossad?

I am not as you say &quot;flummoxed&quot; history is full of tricks like these. But each time and place is different. Socialists should seek to be aware of context at all times in my view. In the case of Syria we know that the Christian minority is either supportive of the regime or acquiescent out of fear of what might come next. And its a real fear. Look at what&#039;s happened to the once large Christian minority in Iraq. The Alawite minority support Assad because they see him as one of their own and because of the benefits they have received in recent years. Without them it seems to me the regime must fall, but if they are backed into a corner fearful of a Sunni backlash? Of course it has not always been thus. Forty or so years ago the Alawites were treated as inferiors by the more &quot;sophisticated&quot; urban middle class Sunnis of the cities. I am not as you say to others &quot;running scared&quot; of the Salafist extremists, but unlike you I do not ignore their presence.

In the 1940s Greek resistance movement the resistance was largely done by ELAS/EAM which was communist influenced. The nominal Stalinist leaders hid in Athens. The nationalist resistance group EDES was notorious not just for its monarchist tendencies and ambivalent view to the Germans but also its unwillingness to co-operate with EAM. True EAM received some support from the British but this was often reluctant and with many strings attached. As is well documented some SOE operatives parachuted into the mountains &quot;went native&quot; sometimes in exasperation at the cynicism of British policy. Patrick Leigh-Fermor, in Crete, remained a loyal monarchist and rightist. As the Nazis withdrew EAM was betrayed not just by the British who supported the monarchists who had been training far right battalions often drawn from Nazi sympathisers and elements of EDES, but also by the Stalinists who ordered the resistance movement to disarm. In 1944, for example Aris Velouchiotis, a leader of EAM, refused to disarm and was abandoned by the Stalinists to his fate. Chased by rightists through the mountains to be caught and be-headed. British troops were used to put down a putative communist uprising in Athens. With friends like these?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So even though you dance round the issue, your solution to the &#8220;Syrian impasse&#8221; ultimately is for the Imperialists to arm the &#8220;popular uprising&#8221; irrespective of what that means? You should apply for a job at Langley maybe? Or Mossad?</p>
<p>I am not as you say &#8220;flummoxed&#8221; history is full of tricks like these. But each time and place is different. Socialists should seek to be aware of context at all times in my view. In the case of Syria we know that the Christian minority is either supportive of the regime or acquiescent out of fear of what might come next. And its a real fear. Look at what&#8217;s happened to the once large Christian minority in Iraq. The Alawite minority support Assad because they see him as one of their own and because of the benefits they have received in recent years. Without them it seems to me the regime must fall, but if they are backed into a corner fearful of a Sunni backlash? Of course it has not always been thus. Forty or so years ago the Alawites were treated as inferiors by the more &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; urban middle class Sunnis of the cities. I am not as you say to others &#8220;running scared&#8221; of the Salafist extremists, but unlike you I do not ignore their presence.</p>
<p>In the 1940s Greek resistance movement the resistance was largely done by ELAS/EAM which was communist influenced. The nominal Stalinist leaders hid in Athens. The nationalist resistance group EDES was notorious not just for its monarchist tendencies and ambivalent view to the Germans but also its unwillingness to co-operate with EAM. True EAM received some support from the British but this was often reluctant and with many strings attached. As is well documented some SOE operatives parachuted into the mountains &#8220;went native&#8221; sometimes in exasperation at the cynicism of British policy. Patrick Leigh-Fermor, in Crete, remained a loyal monarchist and rightist. As the Nazis withdrew EAM was betrayed not just by the British who supported the monarchists who had been training far right battalions often drawn from Nazi sympathisers and elements of EDES, but also by the Stalinists who ordered the resistance movement to disarm. In 1944, for example Aris Velouchiotis, a leader of EAM, refused to disarm and was abandoned by the Stalinists to his fate. Chased by rightists through the mountains to be caught and be-headed. British troops were used to put down a putative communist uprising in Athens. With friends like these?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jen Izaakson: Why was I victimised? by Simon Hardy</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/04/30/jen-izaakson-why-was-i-victimised/#comment-6347</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 06:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4347#comment-6347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea Jen supports the shutting down of ULU is so laughable I&#039;m not even sure why I bothered writing this comment to point out how laughable it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea Jen supports the shutting down of ULU is so laughable I&#8217;m not even sure why I bothered writing this comment to point out how laughable it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jen Izaakson: Why was I victimised? by Lee Rock</title>
		<link>http://anticapitalists.org/2013/04/30/jen-izaakson-why-was-i-victimised/#comment-6339</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anticapitalists.org/?p=4347#comment-6339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sacha, you continue to ignore the issue of democratic elections.  Agree/disagree with the Officer in question, but if they are elected should socialists challenge them amongst their electorate instead of a small group replacing the person?
Was their no way a recall election could be called?  What efforts were made to do so?
ps  Your stuff about &#039;endorsing the decision to abollish ULU&#039; is simply childish and would be laughed at in the tu movement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacha, you continue to ignore the issue of democratic elections.  Agree/disagree with the Officer in question, but if they are elected should socialists challenge them amongst their electorate instead of a small group replacing the person?<br />
Was their no way a recall election could be called?  What efforts were made to do so?<br />
ps  Your stuff about &#8216;endorsing the decision to abollish ULU&#8217; is simply childish and would be laughed at in the tu movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
